Okamura Contessa II vs HÅG Capisco Puls
Side by side from official specifications, sourced prices and User Insights. No written comparison exists for this pair yet.
VS
HÅG / Flokk
HÅG Capisco Puls
$1,172 – $1,482
Differences at a glance
Sources
- Okamura Contessa II Spec Guide, Global (BIFMA, mm), January 2026 ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- HÅG Capisco Puls factsheet ENG (Oct 2019), Flokk ↗Checked Sep 29, 2026
- Contessa II | Okamura global (okamura.com, Asia Pacific English) ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- HÅG Capisco Puls Spec Sheet (US, 2026-08-06), Flokk ↗Checked Sep 29, 2026
- Okamura Japan product page: Contessa Seconda (Japanese) ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- Okamura Global General Warranty Statement (excludes Japan) ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- OKAMURA Lifestyle Store (Japan) (price) ↗Checked Oct 11, 2026
- HÅG US Price List (Flokk, 8.6.26) (price) ↗Checked Sep 29, 2026
Okamura Contessa IIHÅG Capisco Puls
- Price
- ¥243,650 – ¥377,410$1,172 – $1,482
- Seat height
- 434–544 mm (17.1–21.4 in)400–535 mm (15.7–21.1 in); 470–650 mm (18.5–25.6 in); 555–805 mm (21.9–31.7 in)
- Seat depth
- 400–450 mm (15.7–17.7 in)400–470 mm (15.7–18.5 in)
- Load capacity
- 300 lb (136 kg)300 lb (136 kg)
- Recline
- Ankle-tilt reclining; recline angle 26°Tilt range is 15° backwards from a neutral position 2° to the rear
- Warranty
- 10 years: structural components, including mechanisms and adjustable arms; 5 years: casters, gas cylinder, adjustment levers; 2 years: coating finish, mesh and fabric, cushions, arm pads10-year guarantee against production defects (normal use up to 9 hours per day)
What users mention
From 2 Okamura Contessa II and 4 HÅG Capisco Puls user reviews, most mentioned first. Green is liked, orange is a caution.
Comfort
Okamura Contessa II7 mentionsHÅG Capisco Puls5 mentionsSize and fit
Okamura Contessa II4 mentionsHÅG Capisco Puls8 mentionsDesign
Okamura Contessa II3 mentionsHÅG Capisco Puls9 mentionsSeat
Okamura Contessa II7 mentionsHÅG Capisco Puls3 mentionsPrice and value
Okamura Contessa II6 mentionsHÅG Capisco Puls4 mentionsAdjustability
Okamura Contessa II5 mentionsHÅG Capisco Puls4 mentions
Questions
Which has a higher weight capacity?
Neither. Both are rated for 300 lb in their official specifications.
What do owners mention most?
Comfort for the Okamura Contessa II, and design for the HÅG Capisco Puls, based on review summaries.
Swap in a similar chair
Compare Okamura Contessa II with
Compare HÅG Capisco Puls with
More comparisons
- Okamura Contessa II vs Steelcase Gesture Arms: 4D arm or fixed arm on Okamura Contessa II; Width 10.25–22.5 in between arms on Steelcase Gesture.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Herman Miller Aeron Arms: 4D arm or fixed arm on Okamura Contessa II; Arm height 7.5–11.5 in on Herman Miller Aeron.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Steelcase Leap V2 Load capacity: 300 lb on Okamura Contessa II; 400 lb on Steelcase Leap V2.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Herman Miller Cosm High Back Arms: 4D arm or fixed arm on Okamura Contessa II; Leaf Arms on Herman Miller Cosm High Back.
- HÅG Capisco Puls vs Herman Miller Aeron Load capacity: 300 lb on HÅG Capisco Puls; 300 / 350 / 400 lb on Herman Miller Aeron.
- HÅG Capisco Puls vs Steelcase Gesture Load capacity: 300 lb on HÅG Capisco Puls; 400 lb on Steelcase Gesture.

