Okamura Contessa II vs HÅG Capisco Puls

Side by side from official specifications, sourced prices and User Insights. No written comparison exists for this pair yet.

Okamura Contessa II

Okamura

Okamura Contessa II

¥243,650 – ¥377,410

≈ $1,530 – $2,380

VS
HÅG Capisco Puls

HÅG / Flokk

HÅG Capisco Puls

$1,172 – $1,482

Okamura Contessa IIHÅG Capisco Puls
Price
¥243,650 – ¥377,410$1,172 – $1,482
Seat height
434–544 mm (17.1–21.4 in)400–535 mm (15.7–21.1 in); 470–650 mm (18.5–25.6 in); 555–805 mm (21.9–31.7 in)
Seat depth
400–450 mm (15.7–17.7 in)400–470 mm (15.7–18.5 in)
Load capacity
300 lb (136 kg)300 lb (136 kg)
Recline
Ankle-tilt reclining; recline angle 26°Tilt range is 15° backwards from a neutral position 2° to the rear
Warranty
10 years: structural components, including mechanisms and adjustable arms; 5 years: casters, gas cylinder, adjustment levers; 2 years: coating finish, mesh and fabric, cushions, arm pads10-year guarantee against production defects (normal use up to 9 hours per day)

What users mention

From 2 Okamura Contessa II and 4 HÅG Capisco Puls user reviews, most mentioned first. Green is liked, orange is a caution.

  • Comfort

    Okamura Contessa II7 mentions
    HÅG Capisco Puls5 mentions
  • Size and fit

    Okamura Contessa II4 mentions
    HÅG Capisco Puls8 mentions
  • Design

    Okamura Contessa II3 mentions
    HÅG Capisco Puls9 mentions
  • Seat

    Okamura Contessa II7 mentions
    HÅG Capisco Puls3 mentions
  • Price and value

    Okamura Contessa II6 mentions
    HÅG Capisco Puls4 mentions
  • Adjustability

    Okamura Contessa II5 mentions
    HÅG Capisco Puls4 mentions

Questions

Which has a higher weight capacity?

Neither. Both are rated for 300 lb in their official specifications.

What do owners mention most?

Comfort for the Okamura Contessa II, and design for the HÅG Capisco Puls, based on review summaries.

Swap in a similar chair

More comparisons