HÅG Capisco Puls vs Okamura Contessa II
Side by side from official specifications, sourced prices and User Insights. No written comparison exists for this pair yet.
HÅG / Flokk
HÅG Capisco Puls
$1,172 – $1,482
VS
Differences at a glance
Sources
- HÅG Capisco Puls factsheet ENG (Oct 2019), Flokk ↗Checked Sep 29, 2026
- Okamura Contessa II Spec Guide, Global (BIFMA, mm), January 2026 ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- HÅG Capisco Puls Spec Sheet (US, 2026-08-06), Flokk ↗Checked Sep 29, 2026
- Contessa II | Okamura global (okamura.com, Asia Pacific English) ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- Okamura Japan product page: Contessa Seconda (Japanese) ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- Okamura Global General Warranty Statement (excludes Japan) ↗Checked Sep 26, 2026
- HÅG US Price List (Flokk, 8.6.26) (price) ↗Checked Sep 29, 2026
- OKAMURA Lifestyle Store (Japan) (price) ↗Checked Oct 11, 2026
HÅG Capisco PulsOkamura Contessa II
- Price
- $1,172 – $1,482¥243,650 – ¥377,410
- Seat height
- 400–535 mm (15.7–21.1 in); 470–650 mm (18.5–25.6 in); 555–805 mm (21.9–31.7 in)434–544 mm (17.1–21.4 in)
- Seat depth
- 400–470 mm (15.7–18.5 in)400–450 mm (15.7–17.7 in)
- Load capacity
- 300 lb (136 kg)300 lb (136 kg)
- Recline
- Tilt range is 15° backwards from a neutral position 2° to the rearAnkle-tilt reclining; recline angle 26°
- Warranty
- 10-year guarantee against production defects (normal use up to 9 hours per day)10 years: structural components, including mechanisms and adjustable arms; 5 years: casters, gas cylinder, adjustment levers; 2 years: coating finish, mesh and fabric, cushions, arm pads
What users mention
From 4 HÅG Capisco Puls and 2 Okamura Contessa II user reviews, most mentioned first. Green is liked, orange is a caution.
Design
HÅG Capisco Puls9 mentionsOkamura Contessa II3 mentionsSize and fit
HÅG Capisco Puls8 mentionsOkamura Contessa II4 mentionsComfort
HÅG Capisco Puls5 mentionsOkamura Contessa II7 mentionsPrice and value
HÅG Capisco Puls4 mentionsOkamura Contessa II6 mentionsSeat
HÅG Capisco Puls3 mentionsOkamura Contessa II7 mentionsAdjustability
HÅG Capisco Puls4 mentionsOkamura Contessa II5 mentions
Questions
Which has a higher weight capacity?
Neither. Both are rated for 300 lb in their official specifications.
What do owners mention most?
Design for the HÅG Capisco Puls, and comfort for the Okamura Contessa II, based on review summaries.
Swap in a similar chair
Compare HÅG Capisco Puls with
Compare Okamura Contessa II with
More comparisons
- HÅG Capisco Puls vs Herman Miller Aeron Load capacity: 300 lb on HÅG Capisco Puls; 300 / 350 / 400 lb on Herman Miller Aeron.
- HÅG Capisco Puls vs Steelcase Gesture Load capacity: 300 lb on HÅG Capisco Puls; 400 lb on Steelcase Gesture.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Steelcase Gesture Arms: 4D arm or fixed arm on Okamura Contessa II; Width 10.25–22.5 in between arms on Steelcase Gesture.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Herman Miller Aeron Arms: 4D arm or fixed arm on Okamura Contessa II; Arm height 7.5–11.5 in on Herman Miller Aeron.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Steelcase Leap V2 Load capacity: 300 lb on Okamura Contessa II; 400 lb on Steelcase Leap V2.
- Okamura Contessa II vs Herman Miller Cosm High Back Arms: 4D arm or fixed arm on Okamura Contessa II; Leaf Arms on Herman Miller Cosm High Back.

