HÅG Capisco Puls vs Okamura Contessa II

Side by side from official specifications, sourced prices and User Insights. No written comparison exists for this pair yet.

HÅG Capisco Puls

HÅG / Flokk

HÅG Capisco Puls

$1,172 – $1,482

VS
Okamura Contessa II

Okamura

Okamura Contessa II

¥243,650 – ¥377,410

≈ $1,530 – $2,380

HÅG Capisco PulsOkamura Contessa II
Price
$1,172 – $1,482¥243,650 – ¥377,410
Seat height
400–535 mm (15.7–21.1 in); 470–650 mm (18.5–25.6 in); 555–805 mm (21.9–31.7 in)434–544 mm (17.1–21.4 in)
Seat depth
400–470 mm (15.7–18.5 in)400–450 mm (15.7–17.7 in)
Load capacity
300 lb (136 kg)300 lb (136 kg)
Recline
Tilt range is 15° backwards from a neutral position 2° to the rearAnkle-tilt reclining; recline angle 26°
Warranty
10-year guarantee against production defects (normal use up to 9 hours per day)10 years: structural components, including mechanisms and adjustable arms; 5 years: casters, gas cylinder, adjustment levers; 2 years: coating finish, mesh and fabric, cushions, arm pads

What users mention

From 4 HÅG Capisco Puls and 2 Okamura Contessa II user reviews, most mentioned first. Green is liked, orange is a caution.

  • Design

    HÅG Capisco Puls9 mentions
    Okamura Contessa II3 mentions
  • Size and fit

    HÅG Capisco Puls8 mentions
    Okamura Contessa II4 mentions
  • Comfort

    HÅG Capisco Puls5 mentions
    Okamura Contessa II7 mentions
  • Price and value

    HÅG Capisco Puls4 mentions
    Okamura Contessa II6 mentions
  • Seat

    HÅG Capisco Puls3 mentions
    Okamura Contessa II7 mentions
  • Adjustability

    HÅG Capisco Puls4 mentions
    Okamura Contessa II5 mentions

Questions

Which has a higher weight capacity?

Neither. Both are rated for 300 lb in their official specifications.

What do owners mention most?

Design for the HÅG Capisco Puls, and comfort for the Okamura Contessa II, based on review summaries.

Swap in a similar chair

More comparisons